Hist/US from Colonial to 1877

Labels: Classes, U.S. History

Computer Graphics Assignments

Labels: Classes, Computer Graphics

Intro/Physical Anthropology Assignments

Labels: Anthropology, Classes

Introduction to Theatre Assignments

Labels: Classes, Drama

Intro to Public Speaking Assignments

Labels: Classes, Speech

Expository Composition Assignments

Labels: Classes, English 101A

ENGL Final Draft Paper

@5752
ENGL 50
Professor Jacinto Gardea
"The Last Obstacle"
"Justice is never advanced in the taking of a human life," writes activist and civil rights leader Coretta Scott King. Yet to this day, we continue to carry out death sentences. I strongly feel that the death penalty needs to be abolished from the United States because it is costly, ineffective, and outdated. According to the online newspaper, The Guardian, the United States has executed approximately 1,156 people in the time period of 1976 to April 2009. Do not forget to include the 107 people executed from 2009 up until January 2011. In fact, the United States executes a death row convict approximately every 3.5 days (“Is the Penalty” par.4). We, as humans, are prone to make mistakes and this punishment system is capable of leaving irreversible results, so the two should not be intertwined. Many people have been executed either because they were in the minority or because they lacked the appropriate funds to pay for adequate representation in the courts. The Death Penalty Information Center explains that since 1976 there have been eight cases which reveal that the prosecuted persons were innocent after they were executed. That is eight innocent lives among other miscarriages of justice that have been meaninglessly lost due to this unnecessary penalty. In addition, several studies show that the death penalty does not deter, prevent, or reduce crime. Also, there are many circumstances which determine who gets the death penalty and who does not. Why do we continue to pretend that all the wicked will be punished? Even if we did choose to go through all these processes to make sure that the prisoner was one hundred percent guilty, it would bombard our taxpayers with a ridiculous amount of money to pay for the court costs and appeals. Why does the United States continue to waste millions and millions of dollars on this obsolete system? All of the money funding this legalized murder should be put into services that are actually beneficial such as abuse prevention programs, drug treatment programs, education, and public safety programs. Former Los Angeles district attorney Gil Garcetti declares in a Los Angeles Times article:
The money would be far better spent keeping kids in school, keeping teachers and counselors in their schools and giving the juvenile justice system the resources it needs. Spending our tax dollars on actually preventing crimes, instead of pursuing death sentences after [they have] already been committed, will assure us we will have fewer victims. (“California’s Death” par.1)

Not only is capital punishment ineffective but its methods are also subject to cruel and unusual punishment. Pro death penalty advocates will argue that capital punishment is not cruel and unusual punishment but a humane way to murder someone. The Eighth Amendment of the 1787 U.S. Constitution declares that "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed or cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" (Wikipedia). Someone who has not committed a murder cannot be sentenced to death because they did not kill another human; the punishment has to fit the crime and it must be neither cruel nor unusual. WordNet defines cruel and unusual punishment as punishment prohibited by the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; this includes torture, degradation, or punishment too severe for the crime committed. Some forms of capital crime punishments are electrocution, firing squad, gas chamber, hanging, and lethal injection. According to infoplease.com, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia still use electrocution. Sometimes during electrocution, the prisoner's eyeballs pop out and rest on their cheek. Prisoners often eliminate waste, salivate, urinate, or puke blood during the process. As the temperature rises, the body swells, turns red, and skin stretches. After the execution, the autopsy is postponed until the body cools down because the inmate's body is hot enough to blister if touched. The only states that currently use firing squad are Oklahoma and Utah. During this type of execution, the inmate is tightly bound to a chair, strapped from head to ankles, and has a black hood covering their head. A medical doctor then locates the person's heart and pins a target over it. Five shooters, sometimes marksmen, armed with rifles line up and one out of the five shooters is given blank rounds. All shooters aim at the inmate's indicated heart and then fire. The person dies as a result of blood loss or the ripping of the lungs. If the shooters miss, accidentally or intentionality, the inmate could slowly bleed to death. The next method of execution is the gas chamber which is still available in Arizona, California, Colorado, Maryland, Missouri, and Wyoming. During execution, the person is deprived of oxygen to the brain and it feels almost like a heart attack. Hanging, which is still legal in Washington and New Hampshire, can also lead to a slowly occurring death as a result of asphyxiation, or restriction of air to the brain, if it is administered incorrectly (“Descriptions of Execution Methods”). By far, the most used method of execution is lethal injection which is legal in 34 states. In the article, “Study Indicates Lethal Injections May Cause Pain, Suffering” published in 2005 by The Seattle Times newspaper, "An examination of 49 autopsies found that in 43 cases, the concentration of anesthetic in the bloodstream was less than what is required to numb a surgical patient before making an incision” (par.2). In 21 of those cases, the concentration was not sufficient enough to prevent a patient from responding to a spoken demand. Therefore, the prisoners were still in a state of awareness because the drug levels administered were lower than required (par.3). An example would the case of Angel Nieves Diaz's, who was executed on December 13, 2006 via lethal injection. The workers incorrectly injected the poisons, which were carried by needles, into Diaz. The chemicals surged not into his veins as intended, but into his soft tissue. When a second set of needles was inserted Diaz began to struggle in agony for over 30 minutes. After the execution, examiners found chemical burns which measured twelve inches deep inside both of Diaz's arms (“5 Reasons” par.22). The result of this “botched execution” was an executive order led by death penalty supporter and ex-governor of Florida Jeb Bush to halt all executions in the state (par.21). Before his execution, Diaz left a final statement which said, "The death penalty is not only a form of vengeance, but also a cowardly act by humans" (Wikipedia).
Capital punishment is retributive justice. Therefore, it cannot stop the vicious cycle of violence. Retribution is defined as the act of punishing or taking vengeance for wrongdoing, sin, or injury. Like Angel Diaz said, capital punishment is fueled more by vengeance rather than by justice. Catholic archbishop of Washington Cardinal McCarrick writes, “The death penalty diminishes all of us, increases disrespect for human life, and offers the tragic illusion that we can teach that killing is wrong by killing [others]" (White par.5). Death penalty opponent Brian Evans points out that the 2008 FBI crime report shows that the number of death sentences and executions declined slightly as well as the murder rates in 2008. This has been an ongoing rate for a while now. Generally speaking, the Southern states contain the highest murder rates ("Homicide Rates" par.1). Consequently, states that do not use capital punishment usually have lower murder rates. "In fact all but one of the 14 states with no death penalty [...] had murder rates below the national rate of 5.4 per 100,000 [people]" ("Homicide Rates" par.2). Many criminologists agree that the death penalty does not pertain to solving this issue. According to The Death Penalty Information Center, a survey asked the country's most prestigious criminological associations if capital punishment executions reduced homicide rates. 5 percent agreed that the death penalty was effective. 7 percent of the criminologists had no opinion. However, 88 percent strongly rejected the idea that the death penalty resulted in lower homicide rates ("Facts About" 3). Although the death penalty tries to teach us not to kill, ultimately it is backwardly killing people, which could be sending off the wrong message. Regardless, violence is still prominent in almost every aspect of our culture: “in music, movies, television shows, video games, literature, political attitudes, and abuse towards children, domestic partners, and prisoners. This past century has been the most violent in human history,” so it is no surprise why the death penalty still remains (Williams 124). Lawyer Clarence Darrow points out that states continue to execute victims not so much to protect society itself but to satisfy the people’s strong emotions of hatred and revenge (Williams 121). Murderers do deserve a punishment because they have violated other human beings’ fundamental right to live. However, there are other alternatives to punish the criminal. Life imprisonment with parole, life imprisonment without parole, and life without parole and restitution are all effective punishments in place of the death penalty.
When we support capital punishment we assume that the convicted criminals are unable to recover. Who is to say that all criminals are unable to be rehabilitated? Pro death penalty advocates argue that these murderers should die instead of clogging our already overcrowded prisons to house them, and they believe that all the wicked are unable to recover. Though, if our retributive justice system were replaced by a restorative justice system not only would costs go down but so would the amount of returning prisoners. The way the U.S. system currently works does not give enough focus on recuperating offenders. First of all, prisons should be reserved for those who commit truly heinous crimes, such as mass murders, homicide attempts, rape, and so on. However, the vast majority of prisoners in the U.S. were convicted on drug related crimes. According to One Day at a Time magazine, approximately 80 percent of America's prisoners committed crimes because they needed the money for drugs, violated alcohol or drug laws, were on drugs while committing the crime, have a history of drug abuse and addiction, or a few of these traits combined ("Overcrowded prisons" par.9). A 2008 report, conducted by PEW's Center on the States, found that in the beginning of 2008 the amount of adult inmates totaled to 2,319,258 and one in every 99.1 adults were incarceration on drug charges ("Overcrowded prisons" par.9). That means the United States holds the highest amount of incarcerated drug related felons in the world. While that is an amazing feat, approximately two out of three inmates end up back in prison years after being released on new charges or on violations. Metaphorically, our system is broken but not beyond repair. We must not hastily push the execution switch, but we must replace our current punitive, failed and costly system of mass incarceration with a more cost-effective criminal justice approach that is based on reconciliation, restoration, healing and rehabilitation ("Restorative Voice" par.1).
The United States is the last democratic industrialized nation that still practices capital punishment. According to some statistics from antideathpenalty.org, the U.S. ranks as the fifth highest nation with the most annual executions, executing 177 in 2010. Due to several circumstances, China, Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia have more executions than the United States. Amnesty International revealed that 37 nations got rid of the death penalty all together. Another 86 nations have abolished the death penalty for all crimes. 73 nations still maintain the death penalty; however, the number of practicing nations is much smaller. On the other hand, the list of abolition nations is broad and impressive. The list of abolitionist nations includes Iceland, Austria, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Portugal, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, Nicaragua, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Switzerland, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Belgium. British newspaper The Guardian points out that since 1990, 40 countries have abolished capital punishment including Armenia, Canada, Cyprus, Greece, Mexico, Samoa, Senegal, and Serbia. The number of abolitionist countries is increasing, while the number of executing countries is decreasing as shown in recent data. The peak of executing countries in the last two decades was in 1995 with 41 countries each executing prisoners that year. In recent years, for example 2009, the number of executing countries has sharply declined. Only 19 countries executed prisoners in 2009 (Guardian par.2). That is 22 less executing countries in a little over ten years. Are other countries finally realizing that the death penalty conflicts with basic human rights?
Our government and state holds power over one mankind’s most basic rights, the right to live. Often times, capital punishment is impelled coldly on those who are deemed to die. However, no human being or government entity holds the rightful power to choose who will live and who will die—that power belongs solely to God. New York Times magazine published an article by Clyde Haberman titled "Playing God and Politics with Death" which explains how hastily the death penalty is assigned, especially since there is a possibility that the person is innocent. In one case, suspected murderer Scott Schneiderman was awaiting a decision from the jury to determine whether or not he was guilty. Next, New York district attorney Robert M. Morgenthau would decide if the death penalty should be implemented or not. Morgenthau was described as "personally discomforted" with the death penalty (Haberman par.4). After the grand jury had made their decision, the governor and mayor of New York instantly requested that Schneiderman be executed via lethal injection. "There is, too, a question of how the politicians could be so sure, so fast, that Mr. Schneiderman qualified for death despite having been caught on the spot" (par.7) They have to take account other factors. Does the felon suffer from a mental disorder? Were they intoxicated? Were they mentally stable? All of the questions must be answered critically before the penalty is selected, because capital punishment makes mistakes irreversible once carried out. New York district attorney Charles J. Hynes, who also personally opposes capital punishment agrees, "You're playing God" (par.16). These men are in a difficult situation because they have 120 days for each case to decide whether or not the person is worthy of living; in other words, they are stepping past the boundaries in which humans are supposed to roam. In the article titled "Capital Punishment Cannot Be Justified" by sergeant of the Los Angeles police department Sunil Dutta she explains that one of God’s Ten Commandments, “Thou shalt not kill” technically cannot be taught to us by our state run executioners because it would ridicule the overall message (Williams 42). By inflicting the death penalty on one group while disregarding another, it becomes immoral and unjust.
The Death Penalty Information Center explains that since 1973, 138 inmates from 26 states have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence ("Innocence and the" par.2). Up until October 2010, Florida has exonerated 23, Oklahoma ten, Ohio five, Mississippi three, Kentucky one, Illinois 20, North Carolina seven, New Mexico four, South Carolina two, Maryland one, Texas 12, Pennsylvania six, California three, Indiana two, Nebraska one, Louisiana eight, Alabama five, Massachusetts three, Tennessee two, Nevada one, Arizona eight, Georgia five, Missouri three, Idaho one, Virginia one, and Washington one (“Innocence and the” par.3). The average time spent on death row is approximately 11 years before inmates are finally executed. In comparison, the average amount of time spent in jail before exoneration is approximately 9.8 years. From 1973 until 1999 there was an average of 3.03 exonerations per year. From 2000 through 2007, there has been an average of 5 exonerations per year. In 17 cases, DNA had an important role in proving innocence. The importance of DNA testing is demonstrated in Kirk Bloodsworth's case. In the mid 1980's, Bloodsworth was charged for first degree murder, sexual assault, and rape against a nine year old girl. His sentence was death. Not until eight years after incarceration did they agree to DNA testing. By using both Polymerase chain reaction and DNA testing they concluded that Bloodsworth was not at fault. He became the first in history to be exonerated from death row by the means of DNA testing. Capital punishment should be abolished because it is a system that allows innocent people to die.
At first glance, executing an inmate seems like the cheaper option rather than keeping them in jail for the rest of their life, but in reality, the total costs of death penalty cases are almost four times higher than the cost of life imprisonment cases. The money funding capital punishment cases is taken from taxpayer's pockets, whether they support it or not, to pay for appeals, juries, and specialized attorneys. The article titled "The High Cost of the Death Penalty," written by Death Penalty Focus compares the annual costs of both life imprisonment without parole and capital punishment. According to a 2008 report from the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, it would cost an estimated $94,000 to house a death row inmate annually. The death row population was 670 in 2008, so that would total to up $63.3 million per year ("High Cost" par.6). However if we replaced the death penalty with life imprisonment the cost would decrease to $11.5 million per year, which is dramatically lower (par.10). The report titled "The Hidden Tax" written by ACLU of Northern California reveals that taxpayers pay "$117 million annually for trials before the sought execution of the inmates currently in death row; and it costs California approximately $4 billion more than if they would have just sentenced a criminal to die from disease, injury, or old age inside the prison. Capital Punishment trial costs can amount up to $10.9 million, and in times of economic peril that amount saved could save our sinking and fund-suffering states (par.12). We should move forward and focus on programs such as juvenile and youth crime prevention programs that can help prevent crimes. Revengefully killing the murderer does not and never will bring the victim back to live.
The death penalty has been here as long as man has, but if we want to become a civilized society, we must be rid of it in its entirety. In the past, many people strongly opposed slavery because they saw through the few advantages and into the overall picture. They realized that all people were born equal, so they strove towards abolition which was successfully achieved in 1865. People also strongly opposed monarchy because they realized that a select few should not have the power to dictate everyday lives of the population. Abolition of monarchy was finally reached in 1776. Nowadays, the people of the United States are debating whether or not capital punishment should be kept legal. Its fatal flaws are the millions of dollars are spent annually on excess appeals, insufficient evidence making it an unreliable deterrent and mistakes made are irreversible. How do we know that a quick execution is worse than a lifetime of confinement with haunting reoccurring feelings and thoughts?

Labels: English 50

Take Home Final Essay

Daniel Contreras
ENGL 50
Professor Jacinto Gardea
9 May 2011
Take Home Final Exam
Dear Mr. Gardea,
After I finished reading your play titled Grammar, Punctuation, and Writing: A Punc-Gramma-Drama I realized that the semester was almost over; these four months flew by fast. The ending of the play was very disappointing—and a bit tacky—but I did picture the final scene in my head, so it was mildly effective because it left me curious about Nikki’s condition. Because the ending was so sudden, you should write a part two to the play so we can know what happens. After I had finished reading the play, I looked back at the previous chapters to reflect. Though to be honest, I did not read chapter four completely since it was too long and it looked tedious.
48 pages to finish over spring break will leave a lot of students dreading the assignment—on top of other course work—but maybe if they were to just complete the crucial parts such as the letters and practice quizzes then maybe more students will attempt it. However, I do realize that this is college and simple tasks like reading a chapter are not too outrageous.
Personally, I did like the letters from the play, as they were all interesting to read. At the beginning of the semester, you did warn us that some content may offend some of us. Parts such as the “fake orgasms” in Debra’s letter or the description about Lencho’s desire to kiss Escopeta’s “legs and boobs” could make someone feel uncomfortable. On the other hand, we should all be mature enough to handle things of that nature. A thing I did not like was the lengthy chapters as I may have already explained before. Chapter four is the same length as chapters two and five combined. Maybe in future plays the chapters could be a tad shorter; still, I can’t complain since some professors do assign an entire book to be read in a week. It would also be beneficial if the Table of Contents included the page numbers to Escopeta’s, Benito’s, and Debra’s letters. That way we can locate them without having to turn through countless pages to find them.
The audio files you played for the first couple of chapters slightly threw me off. For example, when they would say the dialogue they would always mention the person’s first name which got irritating quickly. Maybe for next semester—during summer or fall—you could have some students act out scenes from the various chapters so that they can learn while acting it out. Who knows, maybe their reenactments could be humorous? I suggested that because you could record your students performing. They would be able to listen, read, watch, and be a part of the play simultaneously.
Eduvijes, whom was my favorite character, reminds me of my grandmother because of her broken English. Some students may find her parts quite irritating or unnecessary, but I enjoyed her presence in the story. She added a whole different level of realism and believability to the storyline since they were in a class for disadvantaged English speakers. Tencha was probably the most kick back teacher I have ever heard of. I wish I could have her as my English 101A teacher. That is all of the feedback that I have for you Mr. Gardea. It was cool having you as my professor this semester.
Alright, now I will explain to you how I used the things you taught us this semester. Did you notice those dashes that I used in the first paragraph? In the sentence, The ending of the play was very disappointing—and a bit tacky—but I did picture the final scene in my head, so it was mildly effective because it left me curious about Nikki’s condition, I used a dash after disappointing because the thought, and a bit tacky, interrupted the sentence. The dash’s main duty is to separate a certain idea, informational piece, or thought from the rest of the sentence. Another thing that I learned this semester was relative pronouns.
I bet you found one in the last paragraph of my letter were I said, Eduvijes, whom was my favorite character, reminds me of my grandmother because of her broken English. The word whom is the relative pronoun in that sentence. The main purpose of relative pronouns is to connect a relative clause to a larger clause. Speaking of clauses, I used a lot of them in my letter. For example, Chapter four is the same length as chapters two and five combined is a clause because it has a subject (Chapter four) and a verb (is). All independent clauses must have at least one subject and one verb. Independent clauses can also stand alone as proper sentences. Dependent clauses, on the other hand, cannot alone be finished sentences. Often times we connect dependent clauses with commas, but we sometimes connect them with conjunctive adverbs or coordinating conjunctions. Here is an example of a dependent clause that I wrote in my letter: After I had finished reading the play, I looked back at the previous chapters to reflect. The last part of that sentence, I looked back at the previous chapters to reflect, can stand alone as a sentence because it has a subject (I) and a verb (looked). After I had finished reading the play cannot be an independent clause because the word after acts as a subordinating conjunction.
Subordinating conjunctions, such as although, before, and while, connect two clauses. However, one of those clauses must be a dependent clause while the other is the main or the independent clause. Though to be honest, I did not read chapter four completely since it was too long and it looked tedious contains the subordinating conjunction though. There are a handful of other ways to punctuate a sentence. One is by using coordinating conjunctions, also known as FANBOYS. The acronym FANBOYS stands for the seven coordinating conjunctions: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so. Coordinating conjunctions connect two independent sentences together. In the sentence, Some students may find her parts quite irritating or unnecessary, but I enjoyed her presence in the story, the coordinating conjunction is but because it is connecting the two independent clauses together—and there must always be a comma before the coordinating conjunction if we are connecting two independent clauses.
Colons and semicolons also play a great role in punctuation. For example my sentence, After I finished reading your play titled Grammar, Punctuation, and Writing: A Punc-Gramma-Drama I realized that the semester was almost over; these four months flew by fast, includes both a colon and a semicolon. The colon plays an amazing array of roles:
- Separates the parts in a multipart title.
- Introduces a list.
- Presents an example or explanation.
Semicolons can act as replacements for the words “also” and “but.” In the sentence the semicolon connects the two independent clauses.
It is very easy to make grammatical errors, especially while using unfamiliar words and phrases. Some of the things we must avoid are comma splices, fused sentences, and sentence fragments. Comma splices occur when two independent clauses are combined solely with a comma (e.g. I love cereal, I also love candy). In order to prevent comma splices from infiltrating our papers we must also take precaution and decide whether or not the sentence has two independent clauses. Afterwards, you could add either a coordinating conjunction (FANBOYS) or a conjunctive adverb. The result should look like: I love cereal, but I also love candy. Similar to comma splices, fused sentences combined two independent clauses together; this time, however, there is no punctuation in between the clauses. Comma splices can be fixed by: including a period between clauses, using a semicolon, or using a coordinating conjunction. Last but not least, sentence fragments are clauses or phrases that are capitalized and punctuated as a sentence but does not create a complete proper sentence. We can usually connect these fragments easily to the rest of the sentence.
Sentence fragment: Joe likes to talk on the phone. Because it is fun.
Correct: Joe likes to talk on the phone because it is fun.
Well I think I just about covered everything in my letter. I hope you enjoyed it!
- Daniel

Labels: English 50